BioDiesel
Overview:
Bio-diesel is developing into one of the most important bio-fuels
of the future. This is because virtually all industrial vehicles
used for farming, transport and trade are diesel-based. Currently,
bio-diesel is produced from animal or plant oils in a reaction known
as transesterification. Oils are first extracted from
the plant and then reacted with methanol and a catalyst such as
sodium methoxide to produce bio-diesel and glycerol1.
Bio-diesel is considered to be an excellent renewable carbon-neutral
fuel, but to enhance its economic viability, improved production
systems must be developed.
In the past decade, the bio-diesel industry has seen massive growth both in Australia and globally. The increased demand for vegetable oils for the production of bio-diesel has lead to significant pressure on the domestic vegetable oil market. In response to this, a number of crops are now being grown solely for the purpose of bio-diesel production, most notably soy, canola, jatropha and palm oil. With more crops being dedicated to production of bio-fuels, increasing pressure is being put on the food supply. Eventually the combined pressure of food and fuel production is predicted to produce a phenomenon known as ‘peak soil’. With only 13.3% of the world’s land mass considered to be arable, and oil-producing crops being specific to certain climates, it is not possible for land-based plants to meet global fuel demand alone.
Algal production systems have long been recognised as the most efficient means of producing biomass for food or fuel; they do not require arable land and therefore don’t compete for space with existing crops. Over the same area micro algae can produce 20-300 times more bio-diesel than traditional crops (Table 1) and the remaining algal cake can still be useful for animal feed, fertiliser or other bio-fuel production systems. However, the initial set-up and maintenance of such systems has, to date, always proven to be cost prohibitive for fuel.
Plant Source |
Bio-diesel (L/Hect/Year) |
Area required to match current global oil demand
(million hectares) |
Area required as a percentage of global land
mass |
Soybean |
446 |
10932 |
72.9 |
Rapeseed |
119 |
4097 |
27.3 |
Mustard |
1300 |
3750 |
25.0 |
Jatropha |
1892 |
2577 |
17.2 |
Palm Oil |
5950 |
819 |
5.5 |
Algae (low) |
45000 |
108 |
0.7 |
Algae (high) |
137000 |
36 |
0.2 |
Table 1: Comparison between crop efficiencies for bio-diesel production 2,3
Common stream:
The first stage of all bio-fuel production is the production of biomass. Following the modules set out for improving photosynthetic efficiency, we will be utilising methods developed in the bio-hydrogen project to modify algal species best suited for bio-diesel production.
Specific stream:
The Solar Bio-fuels Consortium is building up a large collection
of local algal species from marine, brackish and fresh water environments.
Each of the isolated species is being grown under a variety of
conditions and then screened for properties desirable for bio-fuel
production. Using scaled-up systems, the most promising local
strains are being compared to the highest oil-producing algal
species for bio-fuel production from around the world. The key
properties being screened include:
- Efficiency of oil production
- Engineering-improved light capture efficiency
- Engineering-improved salt tolerance
- Growth rates
- Resistance to fluctuating climatic conditions
- Competitiveness in mixed culture
- Valuable by-products (eg. protein and carbohydrate composition, as the processed algal cake can be further utilised for animal feed, fertiliser or in other bio-fuel production systems
- Bio-reactor design
References:
Fukuda, H., Kondo, A. & Noda, H. (2001) Biodiesel fuel production by transesterification of oils. J Biosci Bioeng 92: 405–16.
Sheehan, J., Dunahay, T., Benemann, J. & Roessler, P. (1998) A look back at the U.S. Department of Energy's Aquatic Species Program—biodiesel from algae. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO; Report NREL/TP-580–24190.
Chisti Y. (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25: 294–306.